Posts Tagged ‘benchmark’
Western Digital EARS Series – 1Tb WD10EARS Review Benchmark
November 6th, 2010 / 5 Comments » / by AF8AB
This is my second 1Tb hard drive, I purchased a Western Digital Caviar Green 1 Tera Byte internal hard disk. Model: WD10EARS – This drive comes with 64Mb Cache and is available in 1.5Tb WD15EARS & 2Tb WD20EARS models too. This is a comparatively slow hard disk as its engineered to be quiet, cool and power efficient.
I did a benchmark using HD TACH and HD Tune Pro to compare it with previous model of Caviar Green 1Tb hard drive that I have WD10EADS. This performs a little faster than old model because of the new 64MB Cache.
Read more for detailed benchmark and review.
HTC Desire: Android – Froyo vs Eclair Benchmark
August 6th, 2010 / 4 Comments » / by Faizan
Last month I benchmarked my HTC Desire running android 2.1 Eclair to compare it with upcoming Android 2.2 Froyo release. As promised, HTC released Froyo update for HTC Desire on 1st August 2010. I’ve been using it for around 5 days now and I’ve noticed significant improvement. Phone is much more responsive and fast. I’ve done quick benchmark to compare Eclair with new Froyo update.
HTC Desire – Benchmark
July 10th, 2010 / 17 Comments » / by Faizan
As we know HTC desire comes with great specs 1 GHz processor and 576 MB or Ram, I’ve done quick benchmark to compare it with upcoming Android 2.2 (Froyo) release. There are rumors that HTC will release Froyo for Desire in Q3 2010 and as demonstrated at Google IO 2010 Froyo is 2x to 5x times faster from its Predecessor (Eclair). I’ve used two free apps from market for this Benchmark, one is BenchmarkPi and other is Benchmark. When Froyo will be released I’ll use same apps to check whether its 2 – 5x times faster as promised or not.
Internet Browsers: Abstract Memory Benchmark
March 4th, 2009 / 3 Comments » / by sT*rchi1Ð
Proving itself a staggering 42 times faster at rendering JavaScript than IE 7, our benchmarks confirm Apple’s Safari 4 browser, released in beta today, is the fastest browser on the planet. In fact, it beats Google’s Chrome, Firefox 3, Opera 9.6 and even Mozilla’s developmental Minefield browser.
More @ : http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49301219,00.htm
im showin’ memory benchmark here, how it beats the Firefox 3.06 [no plugins used] , Chrome 0.4b & Internet Explorer 8b w.r.t Memory Usage…
Number of Tabs Opened in single window=4,
websites used: [its no advertisement, only a mere random selection]
http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49301219,00.htm,
contact me if u pple find any errors in benchmarks.
Benchmark Pictures Attached:
Upgrading from 7600GS to 7900GT
August 30th, 2008 / No Comments » / by Faizan
I just Upgraded my PC’s GPU from Geforce 7600GS to Geforce 7900GT
7600 GS Specs:
12 pixel pipelines
5 vertex pipelines
128-bit wide memory bus
256MB of onboard GDDR II
Clock speed 400MHz
MSI 7600GS
7900GT-VT2D256E Specs:
24 pixel pipelines
8 vertex pipelines
278 million transistors
256-bit memory interface
256MB of onboard GDDR III
Clock speed 450MHz
MSI 7900GT/GTO
Test System Specs:
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
MSI K8n Neo 4 Platinum
1GB Corsair Value Ram DDR I
500GB WD SATA II 16MB buffer
Cooler Mast 460 Watts PSU
Head to Head
MSI 7600GS Benchmark 3D Mark 2005
MSI 7900GT/GTO enchmark 3D Mark 2005
WD500AAKS Benchmark
June 17th, 2008 / No Comments » / by Faizan
I just got my new Western Digital 500G HDD with 16MB cache. I’ve done a quick benchmark to compare it with my old WD2500KS.
WD500AAKS HD Tach Benchmark
WD2500KS HD Tach Benchmark
WD500AAKS HD Tune Benchmark
WD2500KS HD Tune Benchmark
32-Bit VS 64-Bit Performance Benchmark
August 19th, 2007 / No Comments » / by Faizan
Now a days most of Desktop computers have capability to do 64-Bit processing. As 64-Bit computers and operating systems are around for a while but most of home users still use 32-bit OS on their 64-bit machines. The reason for this can be less availability of 64-bit drivers for old hardware, and most of current 64-bit softwares does not give enough performance boost over their 32-bit versions.
Back in january 2006, I got got my first 64-bit system. In order to check how much current 64-bit application gives performance boost over 32 bit-applications I have done a lot of benchmarking on my system. As I’ve both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Matlab for both Windows and linux so I choosed it to benchmark my system for both 32-bit & 64-bit Windows & Linux.
- AMD Athlon64 3200+ (Winchester)
- MSI K8N NEO4 Platinum
- Nvidia Geforce 7600GS 256MB
- 1 GB Corsair Value Ram (2.5-3-3-8)
- WD 250GB SATA II 16MB Buffer
- Sony DRU-830A Dvd Burner
- LU LAPACK. Floating point, regular memory access.
- FFT Fast Fourier Transform. Floating point, irregular memory access.
- ODE Ordinary diff. eqn. Data structures and M-files.
- Sparse Solve sparse system. Mixed integer and floating point.
- 2-D plot(fft(eye)). 2-D line drawing graphics.
- 3-D MathWorks logo. 3-D animated OpenGL graphics.
|
Comparison Table
|
|||||||
| Operating System | Mode | LU | FFT | ODE | Sparse | 2-D | 3-D |
| Win Xp 32-Bit | 32-Bit | 0.4323 | 0.3576 | 0.2029 | 0.5625 | 0.3697 | 0.5733 |
| Win Xp 64-Bit | 32-Bit | 0.4385 | 0.3987 | 0.2079 | 0.5890 | 0.3673 | 0.5688 |
| Win Xp 64-Bit | 64-Bit | 0.3314 | 0.2546 | 0.2637 | 0.6226 | 0.4429 | 0.5717 |
| Fedora 6 64-Bit | 64-Bit | 0.2847 | 0.2087 | 0.1913 | 0.5279 | 0.4132 | 0.6941 |
| Ubuntu 7.04 64-Bit | 64-Bit | 0.2802 | 0.2032 | 0.1944 | 0.5205 | 0.3974 | 0.7440 |
Conclusion:
Recent Comments