32-Bit VS 64-Bit Performance Benchmark
Now a days most of Desktop computers have capability to do 64-Bit processing. As 64-Bit computers and operating systems are around for a while but most of home users still use 32-bit OS on their 64-bit machines. The reason for this can be less availability of 64-bit drivers for old hardware, and most of current 64-bit softwares does not give enough performance boost over their 32-bit versions.
Back in january 2006, I got got my first 64-bit system. In order to check how much current 64-bit application gives performance boost over 32 bit-applications I have done a lot of benchmarking on my system. As I’ve both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Matlab for both Windows and linux so I choosed it to benchmark my system for both 32-bit & 64-bit Windows & Linux.
- AMD Athlon64 3200+ (Winchester)
- MSI K8N NEO4 Platinum
- Nvidia Geforce 7600GS 256MB
- 1 GB Corsair Value Ram (2.5-3-3-8)
- WD 250GB SATA II 16MB Buffer
- Sony DRU-830A Dvd Burner
- LU LAPACK. Floating point, regular memory access.
- FFT Fast Fourier Transform. Floating point, irregular memory access.
- ODE Ordinary diff. eqn. Data structures and M-files.
- Sparse Solve sparse system. Mixed integer and floating point.
- 2-D plot(fft(eye)). 2-D line drawing graphics.
- 3-D MathWorks logo. 3-D animated OpenGL graphics.
|
Comparison Table
|
|||||||
| Operating System | Mode | LU | FFT | ODE | Sparse | 2-D | 3-D |
| Win Xp 32-Bit | 32-Bit | 0.4323 | 0.3576 | 0.2029 | 0.5625 | 0.3697 | 0.5733 |
| Win Xp 64-Bit | 32-Bit | 0.4385 | 0.3987 | 0.2079 | 0.5890 | 0.3673 | 0.5688 |
| Win Xp 64-Bit | 64-Bit | 0.3314 | 0.2546 | 0.2637 | 0.6226 | 0.4429 | 0.5717 |
| Fedora 6 64-Bit | 64-Bit | 0.2847 | 0.2087 | 0.1913 | 0.5279 | 0.4132 | 0.6941 |
| Ubuntu 7.04 64-Bit | 64-Bit | 0.2802 | 0.2032 | 0.1944 | 0.5205 | 0.3974 | 0.7440 |
Conclusion:
Make conclusion yourself!
You should read










Recent Comments